Innovation doesn’t necessarily equate to disruption – a case study in a bag!

Innovation doesnt necessarily equate to disruption - a case study in a bag

Having just written a piece on ‘disruptors’ (READ HERE), I thought this FT article looked interesting …

A trolley-load of new luggage brands has appeared in recent years, trying to disrupt a staid market with promises of revolutionary ways to pack a bag

As someone who typically packs a bag once a week for some trip or another I wanted to find out what I had been missing and how someone was going to revolutionise this task for me … I hadn’t realised it had been such a chore. But more than 40 luggage entrepreneurs seeking crowd funding on Indiegogo and Kickstarter can’t be wrong,

What’s the big deal? Well it’s not down to looks … if you check out these innovators’ websites they seem to produce wheelie bags that look like … well wheelie bags. So what’s really different must be on the inside. Apparently really innovative bags now offer some combination of an inside light, a missing item reminder, open alert, wireless charger, global WiFi, GPS tracking, a camera, built-in digital scale, face ID and “a Morse code lock” … and (the ultimate in luggage accessories, and perhaps the definition of a true first world problem) a tiny vacuum motor to shrink undies into vacuum packs.

Disruptors want to make a radical difference – but the key is (as ever) to deliver the right solutions to the right consumers in the right way. A solution they value.

Is an inside light really truly disruptive? Would the ability to vacuum shrink underwear really change my travel experience? These innovations feel dangerously close to ‘gimmick’. If disruptors appear as a reaction to consumer dissatisfaction with the status quo, in sectors characterised by complacent incumbents, you have to ask yourself … is there really that level of dissatisfaction with one’s luggage?

‘Segments of One’ – myth or reality?

‘Segments of One’ – myth or reality?

How many segments is too many? At some point we always have this conversation. Clients usually find 4 too few and 12 too many (leave aside that it’s not about how many but rather how you prioritise). So the spectre of ‘segments of one’ leaves us scratching our heads – an existential crisis for those of us who get paid to package the market up into somewhere between 4 and 12 homogenous groups; and paralysing for clients who now have (pick a big number) a million segments of one. But is it? And what does ‘segments of one’ actually mean?

In trying to get our collective heads around ‘segments of one’ we keep coming back to the difference between segmentation and profiling – traditionally profiling leverages a mass of data to add flesh to the bones of a segmentation – the segmentation has distilled the complexity inherent in all markets down to something manageable. But, so the argument goes, the processing power of IT, and the ability for brands to now get much closer to their customers etc. etc. makes the segmentation step ‘redundant’ as we no longer need to distil complexity, but rather embrace it. This is the hyperpersonalization argument.

In a piece for ‘Think with Google’ Unilever’s Chief Marketing and Communications Officer, Keith Weed, cited the mobile phone as the driving force behind an empowered consumer – who could disagree –  and that its now “driving a hyper segmentation revolution”, and Unilever to “a future where we will build brands in segments of one”.

So let’s think about this in terms of a company that makes things. If my business is making ‘things’ at scale – physical mass customisation or hyperpersonalization is very difficult to do. Scale is important – if I make high spec bicycles, I could customise these to individual taste, but I might make 10, 100, 1000, 5000 a year. What if I make 20million units of something? Whether we are trying to develop strategy or drive something like NPD – we still need to distil complexity into something manageable and useful. Of course Keith Weed isn’t suggesting (I think) that using hyper segmentation Unilever is going down a mass customisation route.

The reality is that we will still have between 4 and 12 segments to allow us to pragmatically manage the complexity and develop our product portfolio and core brand foundations BUT within those segments – data and the ability to now have a one-to-one dialogue with consumers will develop a unique brand experience. Not necessarily one that the brand owner controls but still we can see this one to one relationship as ‘segments of one’. So for a standardised mass market product we may develop individualised brand conversations but we are limited by the nature of the product and the way we go to market. Organisations like Unilever are (it would seem – I have no direct knowledge) looking to developed one-to-one relationships with their consumers – off the back of a mass market product offer. Is this based on profiling within an existing segmentation frame – sort of tactical hyper segmentation within a segmentation? So what is the ‘segment of one’? It is a question of both capability and practicality.

But what about those organisations whose products are intangible …. say Netflix or many financial services companies … companies that can be characterised as having a lot of data on each individual customer and the ability to reconfigure their product offer in an (effectively) infinite number of ways. So they can ‘just’ profile their customer and offer suitable, customised packages (enabled by technology) – they don’t need the intervening step of a consolidating segmentation. Right? Probably not. We are getting much better at trawling data for attitudinal and behavioural cues, and using this knowledge to inform marcoms and other interactions but, to inform strategy, I will bet these organisations are still using some kind of consolidating framework (anyone from NetFlix, please feel free to set me right). Managing complexity is expensive. To embrace complexity to the extent that segments of one would dictate, means redefining what we mean by ‘strategy’. If traditionally strategy has equated to ‘making choices’ – in this new world, the choices are no longer made by the organisation, but rather by the customer. This also assumes that the organisation is less resource constrained – presumably this is a function of technology.

Even as we get better at mining the increasing amounts of data available to us, there is still a long way to go in terms of maximising the value and utility to the customer of this kind of profiling. NetFlix’s ‘Top Picks For …’ seems to me to be little better than random choice – based on watching an episode of 70’s British sitcom Porridge, the recommendation that I might like to watch Top Gear would seem a tenuous link (to me … and that’s the whole point).

Visionary change is a very disciplined business

Visionary change is a very disciplined business

At ESOMAR’s, 70th anniversary, World Congress from 10-13 September in Amsterdam www.esomar.org/congress we will be presenting a paper on transformational change in the financial services industry, entitled …
Are you insured, Scarlett? ‘I can’t think about that right now… I’ll think about that tomorrow’. How MetLife imagined a new future for the insurance industry… and is delivering it today.
In the run up to this presentation we will be exploring some of the themes touched on in the paper with a weekly(ish) blog post. We will also provide a link to the paper and presentation at the end of the Congress.

Read the fifth of our weekly blogs by clicking on this link: Visionary Change is a Very Disciplined Business

While ‘one of the many pleasures of old age includes giving things up’ … this won’t include work’

While ‘one of the many pleasures of old age includes giving things up’ … this won’t include work’

At ESOMAR’s, 70th anniversary, World Congress from 10-13 September in Amsterdam www.esomar.org/congress we will be presenting a paper on transformational change in the financial services industry, entitled …
Are you insured, Scarlett? ‘I can’t think about that right now… I’ll think about that tomorrow’. How MetLife imagined a new future for the insurance industry… and is delivering it todayIn the run up to this presentation we will be exploring some of the themes touched on in the paper with a weekly blog post. We will also provide a link to the paper and presentation at the end of the Congress.

This fourth blog entitled … While ‘one of the many pleasures of old age includes giving things up’ … this won’t include work’ continues to explore the changing nature of retirement.

Read the fourth of our weekly blogs by clicking on this link: While one of the many pleasures of old age includes giving things up this wont include work

That Robot Stole My Job

That Robot Stole My Job

Should we fear the rise of the machines? Or ‘That robot stole my job’!

At ESOMAR’s, 70th anniversary, World Congress from 10-13 September in Amsterdam www.esomar.org/congress we will be presenting a paper on transformational change in the financial services industry, entitled…
Are you insured, Scarlett? ‘I can’t think about that right now… I’ll think about that tomorrow’. How MetLife imagined a new future for the insurance industry… and is delivering it today
In the run up to this presentation we will be exploring some of the themes touched on in the paper with a weekly blog post. We will also provide a link to the paper and presentation at the end of the Congress.

This second blog entitled … Should we fear the rise of the machines? Or ‘That robot stole my job’! explores the future of work and artificial intelligence and the implications for employment and society

Read the second of our weekly blogs by clicking on this link: That Robot Stole My Job

Game changers in patient research: Wearable Technology  

Game changers in patient research: Wearable Technology  

We recently introduced our “game changers” series, looking at why the patient journey is such an integral part of healthcare brand strategy and planning. It’s our belief that achieving a rich, detailed, and insightful view of the patient journey should be the gold standard for healthcare marketers, and in our upcoming series of articles, we want to explore some of the new and innovative ways we can do this.

In our last article, we discussed the role of mobile technologies in helping to better capture the in-the-moment details of the patient journey, and today we will continue our “game changers” series by discussing wearable technology.

Wearable Technology

There’s been a “buzz” around wearables in the research industry for some time. The debate of how to leverage wearable technologies, including Smart Glasses such as Google Glass or Smart Watches and Bracelets such as the Fitbit have evolved with the technology.

But, what was once hypothesised is now beginning to be tested and adopted at scale in research.

How we’re using it!

At Decision Architects we are looking to leverage the latest advances in wearable technology and innovative video analytics platforms, to fill the gap between what respondents may say versus what they actually do. Our focus in wearables has been on the use of Smart Glasses such as Google Glass.

We are able use this type of wearable technology to capture a first-person view of people’s lives and a video curation platform to sift through huge amounts of video footage. By providing an unfiltered and unaffected observation of people’s lives, we are able to uncover truly powerful insights and answers without relying heavily on interview responses.

In trialling this technology, we feel it adapts itself perfectly to capturing the details of the patient journey. This interactive, multimedia approach allows researchers to bring aspects of that patient journey to life. For example, at high burden moments for the patient, to feedback on interactions with HCP’s (before and after consultation), and while taking treatments, in particular device therapy. These “moments” in the disease journey are often areas we, as researchers, ask patients to map out for us in retrospect. However, with the evolution and accessibility of Smart Glasses, we are now able to bring them to life with a first-person account, as it happens.

Our Approach

We look to recruit patients to take part in a traditional face-to-face interview as well as a follow-up “digital ethnography” phase of research.

The recruited patients are provided with Smart Glasses (i.e. Google Glass type product) and given a briefing on how and when we’d like them to use the technology.

Fieldwork periods for the “digital ethnography” may vary depending on the specifics needed to be captured, but we recommend a period of at least one to three weeks to gather enough, rich, detailed and insightful video content. Patients will then wear video glasses at key stages of their day-to-day lives (i.e. while taking treatments, suffering from symptoms, following HCP consultation (or during, with HCP consent)). The scenarios for usage will depend on brand / category issues looking to be explored by the research. Patients will also be encouraged to share video content at their own discretion, giving an element of control of the research interaction to the patient. This co-creative approach has the potential to yield new found insight and answer questions brand and research teams may not even know to ask.

The result is engaging and interactive. We are able to produce a visual “video” journey of the patient experience and even produce a “video dashboard” of content categorised by key word and themes to help rationalize and socialize the insights amongst the broader working teams.

What’s next?

At Decision Architects, we do not believe wearable technology such as Smart Glasses should replace traditional qualitative and quantitative research techniques, yet we feel they provide additional value when used in specific situations, addressing specific business needs in parallel to those techniques. The need for marketers to understand both the emotive and practical implications of a disease is key to unlocking brand potential, supporting and providing broader “beyond-the-pill” initiatives for the patient and being truly patient centric. We feel Smart Glasses are able to supplement a more traditional research programme and help achieve these goals.

As the “buzz” continues, we will continue to explore new ways of leveraging those technologies, and supporting our clients.

Game changers in patient research: mobile technologies and applications

Game changers in patient research: mobile technologies and applications

We recently introduced our “game changers” series, looking at why the patient journey is such an integral part of healthcare brand strategy and planning. It’s our belief that achieving a rich, detailed, and insightful view of the patient journey should be the gold standard for healthcare marketers, and in our upcoming series of articles, we want to explore some of the new and innovative ways we can do this.

Over the course of the next few weeks we will look at the role of mobile, wearable, social and online technologies and how they affect the way we can research today’s patient experience.  Today’s article will start with mobile technologies and applications.

Mobile economy

We’ve all seen and heard the numbers before – the mobile industry continues to scale rapidly, with a total of 3.6 billion unique mobile subscribers at the end of 2014. Half of the world’s population now has a mobile subscription—up from just one in five 10 years ago. An additional one billion subscribers are predicted by 2020, taking the global penetration rate to approximately 60%[1].

Like any other industry, both healthcare and research are adapting to this change and learning how “mobile” is impacting its established operating models, identifying both its challenges and opportunities.

For healthcare itself, the questions come in how “mobile” can be used as a tool to better care models for patients and potentially reduce the logistical and financial burden on healthcare payers and governments around the world. But, change doesn’t come easy in an industry traditionally reticent to change and while the scale of mobile health is impressive, questions still arise as to the extent it’s resulted in genuine behaviour change.

For research, the questions come in how “mobile” can improve what’s already available through traditional quantitative and qualitative techniques. Undoubtedly the scale and opportunity of bringing research to the mobile phones of millions, if not billions of respondents is exciting. However, innovation for the sake of innovation is likely to prove ineffective, costly and potentially (already) detrimental to long-term adoption at scale. The true value of mobile research will be reached by those who unlock its potential at the right time, in the right circumstance.

Today’s article will focus on the mobile research debate, and in particular how we feel mobile research applications can be most effective, most notably in patient research.

Mobile economy: market research

Mobile market research has been a buzz phrase in our industry for many years now. However, when “mobile” burst onto the research landscape many customised research applications lacked the utility and functionality of today’s offerings. As a consequence we saw mixed results in mobile research methodologies. Confounding the problem, was the perception that “mobile” was somehow a replacement or evolution away from well-established quantitative and qualitative methodologies.

So why therefore do we see “mobile” as having “game changing” qualities?

Well, like any product that comes to market, you are likely to see both growth and maturation following initial introduction. The product evolves and adapts to the needs of its customers. And, that is what we are seeing in mobile market research. The functionality and capabilities of mobile research applications have matured allowing for in-the-moment insight capture, wherever and whenever it’s convenient.

However, it’s not just the technology but the researchers’ themselves who have matured to the use and adoption of mobile research. At Decision Architects, we believe mobile research can be used to supplement traditional research techniques and provide additional depth through multi-media questioning built-in to the functionality of the application. In addition, learning “when” and “where” to use mobile research has been as important as making the actual research tools themselves better! Which brings us on to patient research.

Mobile research – a “game changer” in patient research! 

Research is most effective when you ask the right person, the right question in the right way to answer a specific business problem or need.

Patients – the perfect “mobile” respondents?

The Decision Architects team have had experience of conducting mobile market research with a range of different physician types, patients and consumers. And, our experience has shown that patients prove time and time again to be most responsive to a mobile research approach. Both in terms of ability to recruit and engagement throughout the research project. Many mobile research methodologies have explored the idea of giving greater control of the research interaction to the respondent (i.e. to report “in-the-moment”) and patients have been most receptive to this approach. For many patients it gives them a platform to vent or share through a secure and confidential tool. This is particularly the case in patients with rare or hard to treat / manage conditions, where the burden of the disease is that much greater.

However, using mobile with the right respondent type alone is not enough. At Decision Architects we feel there are particular circumstances where mobile research can add depth and give potentially richer, more detailed insight to the patient experience.

Mobile diaries: the evolution of traditional “diary” exercises

At Decision Architects, we believe mobile methodologies has the potential to re-invent traditional diary research.

Understanding how patients feel, and what they experience day-to-day will always be of interest to healthcare marketers. Customised research applications can be designed to allow patients to input spoken-word, video, images or open-text in-the-moment. As researchers’ we must strive to bring ourselves closer to those key moments we seek to understand rather than ask it to be contextualised after the fact.

We believe giving an element of control of the research interaction to the respondents has the potential to unearth new, richer and more detailed insights. This approach will allow patients to share their thoughts and experiences as they happen.

Control of the research will still be gained through pre-set tasks at specific moments of interest for the marketer, for example:

  • HCP Consultations
  • While taking treatment(s)
  • While recovering from treatment(s)
  • While suffering from symptoms

Such “occasions” can become pre-set tasks in the mobile diary that are there for respondents to use as-and-when they go through it themselves.

The results will provide a longitudinal view of the patient experience, “in-the-moment”. Deliverables will be able to leverage the rich multi-media content the application is able to generate.

As a supplement to traditional patient research, we believe a mobile approach to diary research can act as a way of bringing the patient experience to life.

Understanding compliance: quantifying & qualifying non-compliance  

The cost of non-compliance can be great on many levels. To patients it can mean a lack of efficacy and a continued strain from the disease on their day-to-day lives. For product providers it can have impacts on reputation, adoption and continuation of treatment.

However, quantifying and qualifying non-compliance can be challenging in the abstract setting of traditional quantitative and qualitative techniques.

For treatments and conditions where compliance can be a problem a mobile approach may offer a solution to provide depth, data and insight to non-compliance.

Customised mobile research applications have the capacity to be set-up as “compliance calendars”, to help quantify compliance day-by-day. Where non-compliance is a problem, there can be spoken-word, video or open-text response options set-up to allow the patient to qualify their own non-compliance, or even ask the physician to qualify the non-compliance of the patients they are treating.

The results will provide both quantified results to treatment compliance while also adding qualitative depth to explain it. In doing so, we can explore the variety of reasons for non-compliance and adopt strategies and patient support schemes to help with non-compliance for those reasons. Different segments of patients may exist who are non-compliant for a variety of personal, social and physical reasons all requiring tailored strategies to help overcome this.

As a supplement to traditional patient research, we believe a mobile approach to compliance will add more context and bring marketers and brand teams closer to the moment of non-compliance.

Mobile methodologies – a continuing evolution!

At Decision Architects we continue to challenge ourselves to provide clients with the latest in cutting edge research thinking. As these tools are used more at scale, more context or opportunity where they add the most value will be discovered. Our aim is to take advantage of the scale “mobile” offers, however not just as a way of offering innovation for the sake of innovation. We believe they are tools to be used alongside traditional research techniques, and to add depth, richness and new insight.

In the coming weeks we will continue our “Game Changers” series by looking at the value and opportunities of wearables as a tool for patient research.


[1] http://www.gsmamobileeconomy.com/GSMA_Global_Mobile_Economy_Report_2015.pdf